.

Sunday, October 21, 2012

Where in The World......The Loch Ness Sturgeon? | National Geographic Channel - Due Fri., Oct. 26th

The Loch Ness Sturgeon? | National Geographic Channel: Could the Loch Ness Monster actually be an unusually large sturgeon? You may post your answer.  All other W.I.T.W. questions must be submitted.

13 comments:

Unknown said...

Even though it is not likely if the sturgeon had nuclear contact or radioactiveness in its life it could mutate to 5 metres, of course this is from a hewitts point of view so it might not be based on fact, but based on something i read in a comic book when i was seven:)

Mrs. O'Hara said...

Highly likely!

Katherine said...

Yes,I think the Loch Ness Monster could be some type of sturgeon. Even if it isn't, that would explain how people thought they saw the Loch Ness Monster.

Luke S said...

I think the Loch Ness Monster might be a sturgeon but it might not either. Because they have pretty clear evidence that Big Foot exists and it shouldn't be too different.

Unknown said...

Actually, nobody can say it is or is not a sturgeon because the monster has never been seen and might not be real.

Mrs. O'Hara said...

How do you know the monster hasn't actually been seen? What is your proof?

Lindsay :) said...

This probably sounds crazy but i think i kind of agree with luc h because if say there was some radioactive stuff going through the air or something and it went into the sturgeon then i guess it could have become super sized. My dad told me once though about a giant pike! he said it was about 2 meters in length, and there was a guy swimming with them and his mask reflected sunlight from the sun above the water and the pike swam really fast toward the guy and ripped off his mask. I'm not saying i think that the loch ness monster is a giant pike but if a pike could be that big i'm pretty sure that a sturgeon could.

Lindsay

Lindsay with more info said...

ps my mom said that she saw somewhere like a month ago there was a sturgeon 6 meters long!!! i would have included this in my last post but she told me right after i posted it. so i guess that sums up that question. :)

Mitchell said...

Absent-minded thinking but it could be likely that its real and I know that this seems to copy luc and lindsay but I also think it has something to do with radiation or maybe a nuclear power spill near the fish.

Mitchell said...

by the way im mitchell i fogot to change sceen name D;

Rarereaper said...

I partially agree with kyle I highly belive in the loch ness monster so it could be legend come to light and it isn't a sturgeon.

Mrs. O'Hara said...

Aidan - What makes you so sure it isn't a sturgeon. Did you do some research?
Lindsay - Interesting, well thought out response, so far.

Livi said...

I think the Loch Ness Monster could be a sturgeon. Or the Loch Ness Monster could be real. I think it might be real, but it could be a sturgeon because in my opinion they look kind of like they could be mistaken for the Loch Ness Monster.