.
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
Titanic New sinking theory 2006 | Ping4PongWolfie
What is your opinion about this theory? Explain.
other links:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHMv_FzHKbU&feature=watch_response http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=138NHrNNGv0&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pun18bi_0-g&feature=fvwrel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSPPYT-1JCc&feature=related
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
15 comments:
my theory is that it sunk...
My oppenion is that when it sunk that it was compressed by the pull downward and eventually broke right down the mddle
I agree with this theory because it seems logical and it would make sence that if the bottom was pushing inward and the top was falling apart it would break in two and would sink.
After watching this video I do believe that the Titanic did start to break at a small angle slowly. The short simulation makes the case even more beleivable showing the stages in which the Titanic broke.
I believe(now) that the Titanic started tearing in half at a small angle and than after it was further underwater the angle grew larger. The simulation is well done and very convincing and persuasive.
I believe that the Titanic sunk because the front of the boat started to sink downwards. Because of this the weight was unequal making the front sink like a rock. Also because the front was sinking and not the back I think this made the boat go straight down lifting the front up and fipping the Titanic in half.
this theory sounds logical, I do believe the bottom would hold for a short time, but then the front would sink, causing it to break, and then the back of the boat sinking last.
My oppinion is that the water went in through the crack in the side were the iceberg struck and filled it up. Then it flooded up through the ship and finnaly reached the second deck. Then one side was weighed down and passengers and crew went to the starboard.
My opinion about this theory is that the Titanic started to break bending the Double Bottom and breaking in the opposite direction.
My oppenion is that the speed of it sinking would be determand by whaight of each end. Because if more poeple were at the front the front even thow its lighter would sink faster intil it got in the water because the whaight of the poeple makes its haveyer.
I think this theory is very logical. The short simulation show you precisely how the Titanic sunk. I do believe now that the Titanic started to break at small angle. The theoriy would explain why the ruins of the titanic look the way they do.
This theory is logical. And since the front began to sink first, the back would be unsupported so the ship broke in half and the back of the ship went down faster than the front because it was broken and more water came in.
Both of these theorys are very logical and I agree that that could have been how it sank. Since it started to tip and then it broke in half which left the back of there to sink. Thes both make sence and they are very logical. :D
I think that the break-up would have began earlier as to take more time. I do think that it finished underwater and was compressed on both ends, top and bottom. I think it sank mostly (about 67%) on Starboard, later moving to Port, meaning it would tip on a side angle. I believe that the tip of the Bow was maybe 15-20 meters above the water putting pressure on the structure and causing support to fail.
I meant Stern.
Post a Comment